Tuesday, February 21, 2012

Halburn Calls Magistrate Kim Blair A Slut

Misogynist Mark Attacks Another Woman

In another of a long line of woman hating attacks, Mark Halburn last night called Putnam County Magistrate Kim Blair a "magislut." Halburn, who just last week harassed Topix CEO Chris Tolles about people attacking him on that forum, returned to that internet trailer park Monday and did a little attacking of his own.


Hallburn is in North Carolina desperately looking for a job. One of the north carolina sealplaces he has applied to is the State of North Carolina. How do we know this? Various State departments have been visiting PutnamLIES.com since the end of December, for literally hours at a time, to get the real information about him. We're sure they will read this article as well. Let us warn you tarheels. As much as we want to get rid of him, you will rue the day if you hire this nut.
Behavior like this isn't going to help you get a job, fatboy.

Last night, under the sock puppet of "Blair ignores the rules" with an IP address of Charlotte NC, Halburn said the following,"The magislut doesn't think the laws of adultery and common decency apply to her. But she throws the book at everyone else. "

Halburn calls blair a slut

Then this morning he added,"Magislut Blair should be prosecuted. When court officials are allowed to break the law there is no law. "

Halburn calls blair a slut again

Read the whole exchange here:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/autumn-wynds-wv/TS3RJ8V68IUO9DSMI/the-magistrate-kim-blair-affair

This is another in a long line of incidents where he has publicly called people names when they have disagreed with him.
Especially women. Halburn seems to really have a problem with women.
Readers may recall the October 2010 incident where he called the wife of Putnam County Commissioner Joe Haynes "a bitch."

Halburn has had it in for Blair for years, stemming from his 2007 arrest for harassment at the Walmart construction site. Blair signed his arrest warrant and Hurricane Police officers went to Halburn's house where he was arrested in front of his wife.

Since 2006, Halburn has has his extremely large panties in a wad over his
unsuccessful attempt to question former County Commissioner Jim Caruthers, about an alleged affair Caruthers had with Blair while still married to his first wife. Halburn claimed that there was a letter from Caruthers' wife barring him from her funeral. He apparently made numerous attempts to find said letter. We maintain there is no such letter.
Caruthers later married Kim Blair.
Halburn believes they should be prosecuted for adultery. It's also another opportunity for him to attack Prosecutor Mark Sorsaia for not doing it.
We've got news for you, shithead. Adultery is not against the law in West Virginia. The law was repealed in 2010. Find another dead horse to beat.
Halburn will whine that it was illegal in 2007. We say big deal. It was a $20 fine. It's no different than a fucking parking ticket. Do we need to remove all magistrates who have parking tickets?
If you come over to PutnamLIES.com's editorial offices we'll give YOU $20 if you'll shut the fuck up and go away, lippy.

What a great example you are to your son, Halburn. Will teaching young him to call women he disagrees with a "slut" be a value you pass down? Shameful.
It's no wonder your second ex-wife divorced you.
One can only imagine the names you called them and the abuse they must have suffered at your fat hands.

Every time we think Halburn has hit bottom, he sinks to a new low.
Does it make you feel like a big man to call women names behind fake names, fucknozzle?
You are a pathetic piece of shit.

ron burgundy

Related Story:

Halburn Calls Karen Haynes A Bitch

Monday, February 20, 2012

The Chronicles Of Markia 4

lyin' king

This week's episode features the last part of Mark Halburn's deposition. In this episode, Marky talks about how he thinks the City of Hurricane was mean to him, his mug shot and more excessive noise.

James Muldoon on behalf of the City of Hurricane and Ben Newhouse continues to question Halburn.

Our comments are noted in red. Please leave yours in our comments section.

Q. Were you ever prohibited from attending a city council meeting?

A. No.

Q. Were you ever removed from a city council meeting?

A. No.

(He always leaves just before the police show up)

Q. In count 2 paragraph 11 of your complaint, it goes into an issue of some blocked phone calls. I want to focus a little bit on that for a few questions.

A. Sure.

Q. In your own words, what that's issue about?

A. They have blocked the phone lines to the police department, the phone lines to city hall were blocked from both my home phone number and my cell phone number. Recently I noticed that the line to city hall now works for my number. They were blocked from -- I don't know about -- I believe D's cell phone number. At one point when I was in Myrtle Beach, Conway, Myrtle Beach, working last summer, our water was out. D could not call city hall to report the water outage. She called me and I happened to have the cell phone number of Ronny Woodall, I think is his name, the water superintendent. I had to call him from South Carolina on my cell phone to tell them that the water was out at my house in Hurricane because my wife could not call.

The only line that has been accessible consistently is they're -- there's a police department ticket line that you call and you get an automated voice saying the price of this ticket is this and then you push zero. I can get that on my cell phone only. So if I had to call the police department over the last year or so, I use that number, press zero, and hope that the secretary picks up. All of the other lines have been blocked. If there's an emergency and we need to call the police department, we can't call the police. We can call 911, but we can't call, we cannot call the police department. (That's what 911 is for, numbnuts) This has been brought to their attention. Chief Mullins has promised to get it fixed. It hasn't been fixed. He told me that this was done at the direction of Ben Newhouse because Newhouse thought that I complained about the noise too much. Rather than enforce the noise ordinance, rather than do anything, Newhouse made the decision to go ahead and block the phone lines, which violates our First Amendment right to redress our government for grievances.
(By calling dozens of times every day)

Q. Did he state that you were harassing?

A. Pardon me?

Q. Did Mr. Newhouse ever state that you were harassing him?

A. He sent out a letter saying that our calls of complaint to the city council could be, I don't have the letter right in front of me, but, you know, could be or are harassment. We were simply redressing our government for grievances and saying, Hey, there's a problem here. You know, build your Wal-Mart, God bless you. I have, you know, I have no problem with businesses coming into Putnam County. I have given Ben Newhouse, Gary Walton with the PCDA, they had a group called Operation Ignite, a list of businesses that I know of in other states, California, Kentucky, the Carolinas, and said, Hey, I think these would be very successful here. But when you operate a business, you have a responsibility to not disrupt your neighbors. I'm sure, and I'm assuming, but I'm sure that if I walked in your law firm with my notebook computer and said, Hey, I've got this web site, it's progress, I've got to work, I'm earning a living, this is a great thing, stop everything you're doing and look at what I wrote today, you would have the police there and throw me out in five minutes or less. But yet the construction industry can terrorize people's neighborhoods for hours and days and months, and you know, even more than a year and we're supposed to sit back and say, Oh, that was great, can I have some more.

Q. How are you damaged by this, blocked phone calls?'

A. Again, as I said earlier, the inability to redress my government for grievances. The ability, inability as a web site publisher to contact the police department and say, Hey, you know, so and so was arrested, they're on the web site, the jail says it was done by the City of Hurricane, you know, give me some background on the arrest, what happened, where were they arrested, because the jail will say, the jail will have the name of the person, the charges, the bail, you know, and he was arrested for DUI. But they won't have who pulled them over and why did they pull the -- you know, and stuff that background information that you get by contacting the police department.

Q. Could you physically contact the police department, meaning drive down and talk with someone?

A. I could. That takes, that takes time, that takes gas, which continues to increase, which is not the fault of the City of Hurricane. But no one else, nobody else has to do that. I might add that I've complained to the sheriffs department about noise, I've complained to the county. Nobody else blocked their phone lines except for the City of Hurricane. They're taking the attitude we'll just turn our back on the situation, and, you know.

(Mark would rather sit around in his cut-off sweat pants and flip flops and have someone serve him the information. REAL news media actually go get the information instead of waiting for people to fax it to them)

 
And Ben Newhouse advised me on two different occasions to move. Ben Newhouse, the city manager, who advised a long-time Hurricane, I think after eight years you can call me a long-time resident, and, you know, before that I was dating her and visiting, and you know, and she's lived there for 15 years, 16 years. Here's a guy that doesn't even live in the city telling us we have to move. I can solve that problem in two ways. Ben Newhouse buy, comes to buy our house, we'll move, and he'll live in the city. End of problem.

Q. When did you have those conversations with Ben?

A. Once about a year ago. And they had a send-off for Mayor Peak, who retired, and the night of his send-off I approached Ben to complain about the noise and he looked at me and says, Move. I mean, that's completely arrogant. Ben, by the way, lives on a nice quiet neighborhood. He didn't put the Wal-Mart across the street from his house, although I wouldn't object if he put another one in there.

Q. Now, you did state that you still have your 911 service?

A. I still have my 911 service.

Q. And that's never been disconnected or stopped or blocked?

A. Correct, to my knowledge.

Q. Have you ever had to call 911 ?

A. Can't remember when it was that I had the breathing problem where I had to go to the hospital, and then she had a situation where after she had the baby, it was a C section, there was a wound, the wound reopened and was bleeding, and I had to call 911.

Q. There were no problems with those phone calls?

A. There were no problems with those phone calls. And this really is a case of common decency, and the City of Hurricane couldn't spell "common decency" if I spotted them the vowels, the consonants and brought in Vanna White to turn the letters.

Q. In the paragraph 11 you also say that it otherwise interfered with your state constitutional privilege to petition the government for redress. That's just not being able to call the, that police department or the city hall?

A. And I wish that that could say instead of privilege, right. Because that's in the Bill of Rights in the First Amendment, which apparently the people that run the City of Hurricane either have never read, don't understand or have forgotten about.

Q. Your next count has to do with the vegetation and the citation. We talked a little bit about that.

A. Right.

Q. Anything else to add on that issue?

A. Again, common decency. They, they could have given her several weeks so that I could come back in town and work on it. Or quite frankly they could have ignored the problem with us like they did on the mayor's business or the neighbors on both sides of us and half the rest of the city. We don't -- we didn't have a problem, you know, and we've since hired a kid that ironically lives in Hurricane, and I'm giggling because his last name is Kidd, but a teenager, you know, who, you know, has come out and groomed that hill again. We don't have a problem, you know, complying with the law, you know, but going to a woman in August when she's, you know, extremely pregnant in a high-risk pregnancy, someone who's, you know, not even working because she's not allowed to work because of her medical condition, and giving her 48 hours to chop weeds down that aren't hurting anybody when right across the road in front of our house the weeds along the Wal-Mart property, they were tall. I've got video and pictures of all of this. What they did was despicable. What they, what they did was despicable.

(No one forced her to get out and do the work. Except maybe you. Some man you are. Run off when there's work to be done and leave your pregnant wife to deal with it. THAT'S despicable.)

 

Q. Did your wife suffer any physical injuries because of that?

A. She can answer that question. I was in another state. You know, probably some cuts and lacerations.

Q. I believe you testified that her nephew fixed it?

A. Nephews.

Q. Nephews.

A. I think she hired at least two nephews.

THE DEPONENT: D?

Q. We can ask-

MS. SOLOMON: Just tell him you don't know.

Q. We can ask her about that.

A. I don't recall. I think she hired two of them. And the thing about it is our neighbor John Clay went to a city council meeting and said that he rides, there's a hill in back of our home and he rides his riding mower up there when he didn't flip it over the wall recently while he was minding my business when I was talking to a realtor broker, but, and said he couldn't hear, and even Scott Edwards in the council meeting made the comment, Oh, is that Mark Halburn's property. You know, I don't know if John Clay was asked by Edwards to bring it up in the meeting. It seemed awfully, you know, suspicious to me.

(Everybody is out to get you, aren't they, pussyboy?)

 

Q. The next paragraph talks a little bit about selective enforcement of laws. I think we've covered that quite a bit.

A. Yeah. You know, they use the laws to pick on the people that they don't like, and their friends and buddies and cronies they let get away with what they want. And then, like I said, the speed bumps on, you know, Councilman Ellis's street, somebody went down and complained and, bam, they approved it right away. We go down, yeah, we'll enforce the noise ordinance, but they don't.

Q. The next paragraph talks about on August 15th of 2007 you received a letter from Ben Newhouse which threatened you and your wife with prosecution if you continued to make complaints about the enforcement. What was the substance of that letter? You don't have to say it word for word, but what was the substance?

A. Yeah. It was harassment by Ben Newhouse of people that were complaining about excessive construction noise. It was a violation of our First Amendment rights to redress our government for grievances by a city manager who doesn't even live in the city and has ordered us to move. It was plain and simple, despicable behavior by an out of control arrogant city manager.

Q. Did he-

A. Those are the words I can use with the ladies in the room.

Q. Did he allege that you were harassing?

A. Yes.

Q. Are you aware of anyone else receiving letters?

A. No.

Q. Were you ever prosecuted for threatening or not, for complaining?

A. Just the prosecution, the malicious prosecution by Cleveland Construction when I discovered their blaster was blasting without a license.

Q. But you'll agree the city had nothing to do with that?

A. No, I think the city, I think the city had everything to do with that. I think that they took that as an opportunity to try to shut up one of their critics and order the police department to go over there and have me arrested. They never contacted me. If they did, they would have found out what I was calling about. The man was cited for not having a license. He whined and said, Well, my boss didn't renew it. That's like somebody that drives a truck saying, Well, it was my boss's responsibility to renew my driver's license and not my fault because my license expired.

Q. So the, so the city just randomly sent police over or intentionally sent police over?

A. They never sent them to me. I never heard about it until I was arrested. They never got my side of the story. And in any issue there's at least two sides of the story.

(Usually when the police arrest someone they don't ask the criminal for his side of the story)

 

Q. So-

A. They talked to, they talked to the, you know, to the liar at Cleveland Construction and took his word for it, had me arrested, and when it went to court I was acquitted, as I should have been. It should never have been, it should never have been charged.

Q. So how did the city act improperly on that case?

A. By refusing to get the rest of the story, by going for a warrant for my arrest, by arresting me, by doing it at 1 or 1:30 in the morning and scaring D and her mother that was with us and by having me jailed, violating my civil rights. My mug shot was on the internet, it was on other blogs, it was in the newspaper, the story was on the radio. It was a blatant intimidation tactic on the part of the City of Hurricane and Cleveland Construction to try to shut up somebody that was reporting that their blaster wasn't licensed and illegal activity was going on. The only thing more despicable about that is the people that represent the City of Hurricane and Cleveland Construction that, you know, are trying to say that they did the right thing.

Q. So you just believe it's total retaliation?

A. Absolutely.

(It's a bitch, isn't it?)

 

Q. The Ben Newhouse letter, did you ever talk with anyone else about that letter, besides your council? And I don't want to get into attorney-client privilege.

A. Not that I recall.

MR. KONSTANTY: I don't mean to interrupt, but do you still have a copy of that letter? I haven't seen it.

THE DEPONENT: Our attorney has a copy, Mr. Clifford has that letter.

MR. KONSTANTY: Is there some reason why it hasn't been disclosed in this case yet?

THE DEPONENT: I thought it was disclosed in the, in the complaint. There was disclosure of the letter there. I mean, the complaint discloses the letter. As far as a physical copy, that you would have to ask Mike Clifford.

MR. KONSTANTY: Okay.

MR. MULDOON: We can do that.

THE DEPONENT: I do know that he told us to get him the original ASAP, and I believe that she brought it to him within a day or so. Personally when I read it I couldn't believe that anybody could be so stupid as to write something like that, but then I considered Ben Newhouse and that adds up.

BY-MR. MULDOON:

Q. How often do you feel that a person should be able to complain about something?

A. Until the issue is resolved.

Q. In one day?

A. Until the issue is resolved.

Q. So you wouldn't have a problem with someone complaining 10, 15 times in a day?

A. If I was making noise that disrupted my neighbors, my neighbors wouldn't have to complain 10, 15 times.

You know, we used to, a couple of times we held a luau in our yard, and I went to Mr. Clay and the people there and said, Hey, we're going to hold it on this date, is that a problem, if it gets too noisy, let us know. That's what considerate neighbors do.

But until the problem is resolved, yeah, absolutely. I don't have, you know, a problem with somebody complaining multiple times. And several times when I talked to Ben his response is they're still blasting? He wasn't aware that the problem was continuing, and I believe that, you know, his response wasn't being facetious, I believe it was legitimate, especially when the blasting was supposed to end in I think it was June or July and Kanawha Stone signed another contract and more blasting continued. And I remember going to him in city hall and he said I didn't know that they were still blasting, I'll look into it. And I think he was genuinely shocked that it was still going on, but also negligent in not being up there to find out what's going on in his city. He should have done that, he should have known.

Q. I want to turn gears just for a second and talk a little bit about some damages that you're claiming as a result of the actions of the defendants. In your complaint you allege that there's some permanent injuries. What would the permanent injuries be?

A. I'll let you ask my counsel who wrote that.

Q. So you're just not aware of --

A. I believe he's referring to the devaluation of the home.

Q. No physical permanent injuries?

A. We have not been physically permanently injured.

Q. What about psychological permanent injuries?

A. There's still pictures of my mug shot out there on the internet. You know, I mean --

MS. SOLOMON: Stress.

(Were they talking to you? STFU)

 

A. Yeah. I found out, for example, I used to work at Rock 105, and that group is, we mentioned earlier, as a public affairs there, somebody I know got hired to work there, and I don't want to mention who because I don't want it to get back to them, and he happened to call me about something completely unrelated, said, By the way, do you know that your mug shot is up in one of the control rooms. You know.

(And all over the internet. And right here)

 

Q. So it's more of an annoyance and embarassment type of thing?

A. Yeah, and humiliation.

(You deserve everything that you get.)

 

MS. SOLOMON: Trust. I don't know if you have it.

(You again? Shut your damn cake hole)

 

THE DEPONENT: Well, yeah.

A. You know, I don't trust the City of Hurricane, I don't trust the government. I don't trust the government in West Virginia period.

Q. Why is that?

A. Because look at all this crap that we've been put through. A reasonable government would say, Okay, fine, let's have a noise ordinance that protects these people. And, you know, the other attorney, I don't remember, I think Ms. Sanders made the comment, you know, you went to the state. Yeah, the reason I asked for a state noise ordinance is because it takes it out of the hands of the local government that could sell their souls for a Wal-Mart and turn their backs on their people, whereas if there's a state ordinance you can call in the WVDEP just like we did when there was smoke, and they came down within a day, cited them, the smoke, the burning got stopped, actually got moved to the other side of the property, because the burning was done right next to the edge of the property closest to our homes. They had to move it over to the other side and they said there will be no more burning, and a couple of days later I come home and you could see the flames, and they shut it down.

There should be a state response. Now, the state people, and I understand their point of view, says, Well, the problem is if we make a law, you know, restricting construction noise in West Virginia, nobody will build in West Virginia, that will hurt us. So that's when I went to the Feds and said, Okay, let's eliminate that, just make it a federal standard that people, you know, the construction noise has to be, you know, curtailed to the construction site in every state so that people aren't going to build in Kentucky and build in Pennsylvania, build in Maryland, build in Ohio, and not West Virginia because we have a law that protects our citizen's rights properly and the other states don't. So, you know, we lose jobs, we lose business. I don't want to see anybody hurt, but at the same time there's common decency and there's common sense. You know, some governments can be trusted more than others. I grew up in the hometown of Richard Nixon. I learned, you know as a very small child that politicians will lie, they'll cheat, they'll steal, they'll cover up crimes to do whatever they want to do, and I think that's what goes, a lot of what we see around West Virginia. Look at Nitro. Need I say more?

(Why don't you say you come by your lying and cheating honestly?)

 

Q. Currently, I don't know if we -- I don't know if you're still taking -- you are taking blood pressure medication?

A. Yes.

Q. Any other meds right now?

A. I have some diabetes medication that I'm actually out of it, I need to get refilled, but...

Q. The diabetes you're not alleging as part of this lawsuit at all, are you?

A. No.

Q. Just the high blood pressure, which we've talked about already?

A. Right. I don't know if they're related. I -- you know ...

Q. Have we talked about all of your complaints in this lawsuit with regard to the City of Hurricane?

A. For the most part, yes.

Q. How about Mr. Newhouse also, we've talked about all those complaints?

A. They should fire him. You know, it's just incredible that a city manager who doesn't live in the city, even if he did live in the city, to tell people that have been here for that long, Well, if you don't like it, move, you know. I mean, this is a home that my wife and mother-in-law invested in. You know, we've spent thousands of dollars renovating the home through the years to make it nice. It's my understanding from what the police have told me, including Joe Sisk, including Dave Boyles, former city council person, that when she bought the home it was the ugliest home on the street and now it's the best looking. I wasn't here then to see how ugly it looked. But, you know, even Boyles who disagrees with me about enforcement says, Yeah, your wife, you know, the first thing she did was fix up the outside of that home and made it look good for the neighborhood. Then we started working on the inside. You know, and we've still got more work to do. It's frustrating. The other day I saw a gazebo, I'd like to buy a gazebo and put it in our yard, but what's the point if we're going to have to move, you know, we've got it for sale to move out of there. We've got carpeting in a room that we would like to replace and some other things. All that stuff is on hold because, you know, we don't want to live there anymore. Our lifestyle has been destroyed by a corrupt city that has turned its back on its long-time citizens. She's done nothing to them. I mean, if they want to go after me because I point out their stupidity and their corruption and the things that they, you know, that they do and don't do and their selective enforcement and their harassment, if they want to go after me, that's one thing. Pick out a pregnant woman, have our baby woken up at 5 in the morning or at midnight or whatever, that's despicable. Only a neanderthal would do that. Only neanderthals would treat people the way we've been treated. And the amazing thing about it is they've destroyed property value in the city that destroys tax revenue that hurts them. They could build the Wal-Mart in a proper way. If you go down to the Wal-Mart in Barboursville and you take a look at the mounds and the berms next to the Wal-Mart and across the street next to the homes, that was done in a way that protected everybody. The Wal-Mart has its business, the traffic doesn't go in front of the homes, there's something to stop the noise. None of that was done in Hurricane. I mean, I think it was planned by, you know, somebody with a three-year-old's amount of intelligence, and I don't really want to insult the three-year-old. Would you want to live across the street from that?

THE DEPONENT: He didn't say yes.

MS. SOLOMON: All right.

MR. MULDOON: I don't think I have any more questions right now. Does anyone else have any follow-ups?

MR. WHITE: Yeah, a few.

VIDEOGRAPHER: We're going off the record at 5: 14 p.m. (Whereupon, break.)

VIDEOGRAPHER: This begins tape number 5 in the deposition of Mark Halburn, and we're back on the record at 5:22 p.m.

EXAMINATION

BY-MR. WHITE:

Q. Mr. Halbum, my name is Patrick White, and I'm here on behalf of Kanawha Stone. I'm going to ask you a few follow-up questions. And if we could, just briefly, where were you working in November of 2006? Were you at Cingular?

A. Yes.

Q. And how long were you at Cingular?

A. I started I think it was May 9th, 2005, and left the end of January, the last part of January 2007.

Q. Okay.

A. And then I also substitute taught in the Kanawha County Schools on occasion. I didn't teach that often by choice. They called me all the time. But my primary employer was Cingular Wireless.

Q. And then in February '07 where did you go?

A. PRC in Huntington. And the reason for doing that, I was just tired of the commute.

Q. I'm just trying to get a time line-

A. Sure.

Q. -- set for answering questions. And you were at PRC how long?

A. Until I think it was June.

Q. And that's when you went to South Carolina?

A. 2007. I gave notice, and they, like a lot of employees when they give notice, they buy you out, and they bought me out. And then I went down to -- I think it was July 7th I started at WPDE in Conway, Myrtle Beach.

Q. Okay. When you worked at Cingular in Grayson I believe you testified that your shifts were somewhere between 2 and 11 or 3 and 11?

A. Correct.

Q. Somewhere in that neighborhood?

A. Usually, not always. And then on Saturdays they were, I believe it was 11 to 7 or 10 to 6 or in that. They were more midday Saturday, because we weren't open past 7:00.

Q. How long did it take you to get, to drive from your house to Grayson?

A. 45 minutes to an hour, depending on traffic and how fast I went.

Q. Okay. So if you had to be at work at 2:00, you would probably leave 12:30, 12?

A. Or, well, at 2:00, I'd probably leave about 1.

Q.1?

A. And 1:15. But, again, I didn't work every weekday. I usually had a weekday off, either a Tuesday or a Thursday, and I think it was usually Thursday that I was off during, off, because I worked, I worked on Saturday, so I got a weekday off, and I was off -- pardon me. Sorry about that, Mr. Headset. I was off on Sundays.

Q. During that period of time, how many blasts did you experience?

A. A lot. I don't have an exact count. I've made notes of them, you know, in the blog.

Q. You were present for all the blasts on your blog?

A. I was present for all the blasts that I -- no. I was present for some of the blasts, and some of them she told me when they were and I noted them on the blog. There were a couple of times that she would call and say, you know, the house just rocked.

Q. So you really can't use the blast as a guide as to whether or not you experienced the blast?

A. I can use most of them as a guide.

Q. But you weren't there?

A. I wasn't there for all of them.

Q. Did you indicate in your blog which ones you were there for?

A. I don't -- I think I indicated some of them, I don't recall if I indicated all of them, but someone was there. And blasting someone's house is rude no matter who's there.

Q. But the blog does not indicate whether you were there or not?

A. Sometimes. I don't recall if it indicates every time. I would have to, you know, we're talking about almost two years of blog, I'd have to go back and read every page and every entry.

Q. You, you update your blog every day, don't you?

A. Usually.

Q. You spend several hours on the blog?

A. No.

Q. No?

A. No. Usually it's about a five-minute entry. I spend several hours running the web site. The blog is one fraction, one small fraction of the web site.

Q. It's fair to say you've spent five hours a day working on the blog? Or the web site. Excuse me.

A. I'd say it's fair to say three to five hours.

Q. Three to five hours depending on the day?

A. Depending on the day, depending on what's happening with news, depending on, you know, whether -- on Sundays I spend very little time. On Saturdays I don't spend as much time.

Q. What were your hours while you were at the PRC?

A. Pretty much the same as Cingular, evening hours.

Q. How many blasts did you experience while you were working at the PRC?

A. I don't recall.

Q. And, again, your blog doesn't indicate whether or not you were present during those blasts?

A. Not, not for every one, but I that -- you know, again, I'd have to go back and look. I don't recall.

Q. What were your hours -- well, when you left in July to go to South Carolina you were gone until your son was born?

A. I was gone until a couple of days before my son was born.

Q. So during that period of time any blasts, if any, your knowledge about those would come solely from your wife?

A. Yes.

Q. What during -- let's say November '06 through August '07, describe your typical day.

A. Get up in the morning, have breakfast, work on the web site, do some, you know, some housework, although, you know, in a big house there's never time to do enough of it, you know, have lunch, go to work, come home. I would at work on my breaks when I worked for Cingular, we had an internet cafe, and so I had the ability to go on line and, you know, find out, okay, this happened. And sometimes I would come home after work and, you know, with the notes that I made work out, you know, work out a story. During the day I'd go out and take pictures of people, places, events that were going on. Sometimes taking pictures of the construction work. I shot a lot of video. After we bought our video camera, which was just before our son was born, I've shot lots of video of the harassment that we endured every day by the excessive noise and construction. By that point I believe all the blasting was done, but there was still a lot of work being done by graders and dozers and other things that were, you know, that were going on that, you know, harassed our, harassed us. I wish that I had the video camera a year earlier. The stuff that I could have captured on tape were -- it's, it is a tapeless camera, on the hard drive , rather, would have been very graphic and very bad.

Q. You agree with me that -- strike that. During the time period I stated, November '06 through August '07, you were, you were basically obsessed with the construction project, weren't you?

A. No. I've never been obsessed. (Really?) But your client was obsessed with terrorizing my family with the blasting, the grading, the dozing and everything to make a buck at the expense of a family that had nothing to do with your Wal-Mart, nothing to do with your contract, and you had no right to treat us like dirt like you guys did.

Q. You made numerous phone calls to the city during that period of time, didn't you?

A. Yes, absolutely, because -

Q. And you were -

A. -- because your, because your company was out of control.

Q. You made numerous phone calls to CCI Construction, yes?

A. I'm sorry, to TCI Construction?

Q. Cleveland Construction.

A. I made numerous phone calls to Cleveland Construction.

Q. And you made numerous phone calls per day to Kanawha Stone; correct?

A. Not each day, no. On occasion I made numerous phone calls.

Q. Numerous phone calls each day?

A. Quite frankly, calling - no. Quite frankly, calling Kanawha Stone was pretty much a waste of time. You guys didn't give a damn about us.

Q. Sir, sir, if your -

A. I'm answering your question.

Q. My question was yes or no. You complained a lot of this noise was in the morning; correct?

A. Yes.

Q. Did you ever get up and determine whether the noise was coming from your neighbor?

A. Yes.

Q. How often was it coming from your neighbor?

A. Rarely.

Q. Rarely. So the noise from your neighbor only came in the afternoon, that's your testimony?

A. No, I said the noise from the neighbor for the most part might be one to two days a week, if it's that. Many times our neighbor is off doing whatever he's doing, I don't follow him to know, and isn't there. And then when he does, when he is there on the occasions that he is, it's usually pretty loud and it's usually pretty, you know, pretty bad. But for the most part our -- you know, it's like, kind of like living with somebody that, you know, works on a barge, they're gone more often than they're home, you know. But the noise from Kanawha Stone and from Cleveland Construction was blatantly out of control.

Q. You make, do you make harassing phone calls to your neighbor?

A. No. No. After he complained about the weeds, I called him and asked him why he didn't call me and say, you know, and at least come to us and say there's a problem as opposed to going to city council and saying what he did to city council. He didn't like hearing that.

(Probably because he didn't want you harassing him either. And you were afraid he'd walk over and whip your fat ass)

 

MR. KONSTANTY: Sorry, just to clarify. We're talking about the neighbor next door? What's his name?

MR. MULDOON: Kanawha Construction.

MR. KONSTANTY: Are you talking about the construction company or the -

BY-MR.WHITE:

Q. What's your neighbor's name?

A. I'm talking about John Clay.

MR. KONSTANTY: Okay. Thank you.

A. I don't know the phone number, I've never called.

Q. John Clay owns the crane shop next to you?

A. No.

MR. KONSTANTY: No.

A. As I was starting to say before you interrupted me, I don't know the phone number for Kanawha, Kanawha Construction. I wouldn't know how to call them.

Q. Do you own a phone book, sir?

(Heh)

 

A. I'm sorry?

Q. Do you own a phone book?

A. Probably.

Q. You have access to the internet obviously?


(You should see his porn collection)

A. Yes.

Q. Did you ever attempt to find the number for the crane company?

A. No, because when there was a problem with the crane company they were there, I had no need to call them.

Q. The, the construction -

A. All I needed to do was walk to the fence to talk to them.

Q. Wal-Mart construction project has been good business for PutnumLive, hasn't it?

A. Pardon me?

Q. The Wal-Mart construction has been good business for PutnumLive, hasn't it?

A. I wouldn't agree with that, no.

Q. Didn't give you something to write about?

A. It's given me something to write about. There are many other things that I could write about, too, and many other things that I did write about. Remember when phones just rang?

(Who the fuck do you think you are? Andy Rooney?)

 

Q. During the period, and I think this is -- we got off on this.

A. I think the Wal-Mart construction has been good business -

MS. SOLOMON: Let him finish.

A. -- for, for Kanawha Stone.

Q. Between November '06 and August '07, what was your typical day like?

A. I think we already described that. I get up in the morning, work on, have breakfast, work on the web site, shower, change, do the things that people do.

Q. And you left off in the middle of the day is why I asked.

A. And then I'd go to work, drive to work on the days that I was working in the evening, and the days that I wasn't I would work more on the web site or do other things around the house.

Q. What did you do in the evening?

A. I would be working at Cingular or PRC.

Q. Until 7?

A. Until 11 on most cases. On Saturdays it was a midday shift.

Q. Well, if you got off at 7, what did you do for the rest of the day?

A. Drove home, sometimes go out to dinner with my wife. I have never kept a diary of what I do from the moment that I get up until the moment that I go home or at work or whatever.

Q. Do you watch TV?

A. Sometimes, not often.

Q. What's your favorite TV show?

A. The news, Dodger games. I used to watch "Party of Five." There was a show called "Everwood" that I used to watch. You know, "Extreme Home Makeover." You know, I don't watch that -- I probably watch other than news maybe an hour of prime time, two hours of prime time a week. I don't have time to watch that much, and I'm usually gone during the evenings anyway. During the day I'll watch the noon news, the morning news when I get up.

(What a pussy. I'll bet you sat around and watched shit like "What Not To Wear" while D put hot compresses on your irritated vagina)

 

Q. Do you have a VCR, DVR, anything of that nature?

A. No DVR. We have a handful of VCRs. I'd have to do, I'd have to do -- I'm guessing three or four VCRs.

Q. What do you do with those?

A. I rarely record on the VCRs, quite frankly. The last time I've used them mostly has been to duplicate the footage of what's happened to provide copies to the attorney to give to you. I can't remember the last time I programmed the VCR to tape something. We have, we have one downstairs, we have one in the master bedroom, I have another one. I think we have three VCRs now, and a couple of DVD players, and I can't remember the last time I watched it, the last time I watched a DVD.

Q. You mentioned in the beginning that you didn't have a camcorder. When did you purchase that?

A. Towards the end of August, shortly before the birth of our son. And I need to clarify that we had one that broke probably a year before that, and we, there was a gap in between the time that we replaced the one that broke before we replaced it and bought a new one.

Q. You've, you've harassed many of the construction workers with your camcorder, haven't you?

A. No. I've documented the harassment that they did to us.

Q. You haven't invaded the construction site without, without an invitation?

A. No.

Q. You've never been on the construction site?

A. I have been on the Wal-Mart property after it opened. I went to the office when things first got started to complain and was told to leave, and I never went back to the office.

(They should have banned you from the property completely)

 

Q. Mr. Konstanty earlier mentioned an incident involving Kanawha Stone water truck. It's true that you were harassing that gentleman with your camcorder, weren't you?

A. No, I didn't, I didn't -

Q. It's your testimony here today that you made no statements to that gentleman?

A. No. What I said was that I did not have video. The police asked me if I had video, and I said I did not. I took digital pictures of him coming at me with a wrench. He was at the back of the truck, I was towards the front of the truck, so I wasn't even within 15 or 20 feet of him.

Q. You were making harassing statements to him, weren't you?

A. No. I asked him if he was aware that there was a water shortage in Hurricane, and that they were using a lot of water. And he went off on me and came after me with a wrench, which I did not get video of because -- and unfortunately I did not have the camcorder, because the police told me that if I had it on videotape they would have arrested him, which they should have done even with the digital images. And by the digital, by the digital images you could tell that he was coming from the back of the truck and I was at the front of the truck, so I wasn't even within 15 or 20 feet of him.

Q. Do you agree with me that the still camera also doesn't record any harassing statements you made to him?

A. The still-- no, I would disagree, and I would say the still -

Q. The still camera, the still camera does record those statements?

(At this point, Halburn starts to squirm)

A. Let me finish my statement. You're harassing me. The still camera does not record any statements of any type. And your question about record harassing statements is a -- you know, you're tainting the question with your comment. And so I'm not going to come across and walk into -

Q. Sir-

A. -- the trap that your trying to set,

Q. Sir.

Q. Your counsel can help you.

MS. SOLOMON: You didn't make any harassing statements.

A. I did not make any harassing statements.

(These aren't the droids you're looking for.)

Q. The noise that you complain of came from what machinery?

A. The graders, the dozers, things that did drilling and broke rock. I'm not a construction expert, so I don't know the names of all the pieces of equipment.

Q. You did-

A. Backhoes.

Q. You did about several pieces of equipment. Cement trucks, delivery trucks. You agree with me those are not all Kanawha Stone vehicles?

A. The cement trucks are not. The trucks are not. Some of the vehicles had Kanawha Stone's logos on the doors or on the sides of the vehicles.

Q. Your blog does not set out what noise came from what machinery, does it?

A. I would have to go back and read the entries. I don't recall.

Q. Do you have -- you don't have any independent recollection of what noise came from what machinery, do you?

A. Oh, I've already said. The dozers --

Q. No.

A. -- the things that the things that did drilling and broke rock.

Q. You don't have any independent knowledge of what noise came from what vehicles on what days, do you?

A. When you say "independent knowledge," define your question.

Q. Do you -- as you -- as we sit here today, can you say that on November 1st this machinery belonging to this company was making this noise, on January 2nd this machine belonged to this company was making this noise? You can't do that, can you?

A. There's notes in the blog. I don't recall specifically what date what machine made what noise as we sit here on, what is it, July, July 23rd, 2008.

Q. Sir, you just agreed with me -

A. There's no -

Q. -- that your blog did not -

A. I'm not done with my answer.

Q. You're not answering the question, you're running on. You just agreed with me that the blog did not indicate which company owned which machines. Now-

A. On some days it did.

Q. -- is there a reason as you sit here today that you don't want to answer my question?

(Because the truth hurts.)

A. I don't recall specifically what dates and what events and what machines made what noise. There are dates and times in the blog, and you're hitting me with loaded questions and you're having a good time doing it, but the bottom line is I don't recall on what specific dates what machines made what noise. Kanawha Stone was out there for nearly a year making excessive noise terrorizing our neighborhood. It doesn't matter whether it comes from a dozer or whether it comes from a backhoe, it's excessive noise and it has no place disrupting us in our home and in our yard. Period.

Q. But you don't know who did it, do you?

A. I know a lot of times that Kanawha Stone did it. On other days no, not all the machines were labeled with the company logo on it, so it's impossible to tell. And I, you know, I can't, if a thing doesn't have a logo on it, you can't -- just like the guy that disrupted us at 4:23 on Thanksgiving morning, didn't have a name on the truck, so I don't know who did it but I know that he did it. And the bottom line is your people were out there making a lot of noise that was completely inappropriate and unnecessary for, to destroy the peace and quiet in our home and in our neighborhood.

Q. Sir, answer my question. You don't know it's my people because you don't know who was doing it?

A. I know some of it was your people, I don't know that all of it was your people. That's the answer to your question.

MR. WHITE: That's all I have.

VIDEOGRAPHER: We're going off the record at 5:42 p.m.
(Whereupon, off the video record.)


MR. KONSTANTY: Is he going to waive or read? Mr. Halburn, your attorney should tell you this, but I will. You have a right to read and review this transcript or you can waive that right. We need you to indicate so on the record so that the court reporter knows what to do with the transcript.

THE DEPONENT: I want to read the transcript.

MR. KONSTANTY: Okay. He'll read.

(Whereupon, read and sign.)

(Whereupon, the Videotaped Deposition of MARK VANCE HALBURN concluded at 5:43 p.m.)

Next week, we'll continue with Exhibit B, the videotaped testimony of Halburn's second ex-wife, DH.


Related Articles:
The Lyin' King 
The Chronicles Of Markia
The Chronicles Of Markia 2
The Chronicles Of Markia 3


Thursday, February 16, 2012

Butthurt Bully Boo-Hoos

Special Report

topix ceo
Topix CEO Smacks Hallburn With First Amendment

We knew something was up when PutnamLIES.com started receiving visits from USA Today, Gannett, McClatchy and Topix looking for the truth about Halburn. We had a pretty good idea what it was all about. And now we know for sure.PL trash

Topix.com is the ghetto of the internet. It is an online forum that allows people to post any comments they want about any subject, under any name they choose. Mark Hallburn has used over 200 of them on that site, started many topics and participated in every single conversation that mentions him there. When the heat gets to be too much, Anti-First Amendment "publisher" Mark Hallburn has Topix pull any negative comments about him off the forums. Which, of course is what every discussion that mentions him has plenty of. For some reason, people hate Halburn.

After Hallburn harrassed the legal department of Gannett's USA Today, which partially owns Topix.com, they finally coughed up Topix CEO Chris Tolles' email address. Halburn then proceeded to harass Tolles via email, complaining about what Hallburn calls libelous comments and impersonation posts, never mentioning that he participated in most if not all of the discussions concerning him.

Then yesterday, Hallburn wrote a story about how Topix has been rather rude to him.
The entire story is outright deceptive. It's the definition of a lie. He is completely delusional.

What Mark left out of his story is how abusive he was to this guy. We're guessing dozens of emails and phone calls. Notice how Hallburn never prints the any of the emails in their entirety. He picks and chooses the lines he wants to use to make him look good or Tolles look bad.

Well, none of the excerpts do either. Halburn comes off as a petulant spoiled child that doesn't like the fact that someone is calling him names. He can't accept the fact that people have just as much right to talk about him as he does about them.

The main thing Hallburn left out is his participation in all of this. Many of the threads he's referring to were started by HIM. He starts this shit and then runs away when it starts getting too deep for him. You can't be a victim if you keep coming back to participate, Crisco.

Tolles repeated much of what he told Halburn.

We asked how Halburn had the right to silence other users.

"That's not how it works. He doesn't get to gag the users to not talk about him. In any case, we have no legal responsibility to do anything for him and "impersonation" in this way has little standing in the court system. We have a right to run our business as we see fit, within the law. Giving people a platform to say what they want is what America is all about."

Tolles then goes on to say this about impersonation posts, insults, and comments about children:

"Only the second of the threads he references contains someone impersonating him. The first thread is full of insults towards him, and unless there is some sort of actual libel, I see no reason to take it down. Referring to him isn't actionable according to the law, our policy, or common sense. In 2012 everyone is to one degree or another, a public figure. In general, he doesn't get to control the speech of others talking about him."

Tolles goes on:

"Impersonating is different from mentioning him. And, as it happens, we usually remove people and posts for impersonating someone. Insulting him, mentioning him, making fun of him and basically using us as a platform to express negative opinions about him - unless they're libelous, or about children, we side with freedom of expression. If he complains a thousand times to us about someone who said something that is merely a negative opinion, we're still not going to remove it. It's not his call. And, when he sends me a set of threads and says that there are people impersonating him when there aren't, makes me feel like he's lying to me or trying to get away with something. I really do not understand why he thinks he has a right not to be talked about."

We think it's funny that a guy that registered a screen name to impersonate Tyler Hollywood is bitching publicly about someone impersonating him.

Then Halburn complains that one impersonation used the name of his stillborn daughter.

You used the name of the little murdered boy Logan Goodall and you have the balls to say someone "impersonated" your daughter?
FUCK YOU HALBURN!

Did you tell Tolles that you did exactly the same thing when you used the name RememberingLogan? And then when people rightfully excoriated you for it, you had those posts pulled?
It never seems to bother you to trot Sarah Nicole out whenever YOU need a little sympathy or you want to call attention to yourself.

Tolles continues:

"It's virtually impossible to prevent a particular phrase or topic from being discussed. I can't review every post before it goes up or guarantee that your name won't come up. That's actually not on the table as an option.The price society pays for the world wide web being interactive is a lot of trash talk. And if you are a publisher, clearly you are aware of these issues."

Halburn goes on to claim that he filed a claim with WV Attorney General's office. For what?
Nobody violated your civil rights.
"Fat white divorced guy" isn't exactly a protected class.
Most of their civil rights/human rights stuff focuses on discrimination, particularly in employment and housing. Did you get kicked out of your dumpster? Maybe you have a claim there.

They're not like personal attorneys who go after mean people on the internet.
Darrell McGraw is a hack and a whore and will do or say anything for a vote, but doing your dirty work is not one of them.

What do we think the deal is? We think he probably called the AG office so many times they made up shit to get him to stop. He's filed numerous complaints with them and his tactics are well known at the Capitol.

Halburn goes on to say that while even the mainstream media allows article comment posts using fake names, PutnumLIVE.com would never allow that. Really?
How about Earl MacArthur, John T. Reed, Randall Scott or Tom Potter?
They were all fraudulent names used by Halburn in his letters section.


He says he requires real names but apparently it's OK with him if the content of the letters is plagiarized. As long as you've got some sort of ID to send him, you can copy whole articles from somewhere else, sign your name to them and he'll publish them, no questions asked. Conservative yahoo Alice Click is the biggest offender in this matter.

Halburn says " if you want to voice your opinion on PutnumLIVE.com in a dignified manner, you can provide a Letter to the Publisher using your real name. After we verify who you are, your letter will be published (without libelous comments, of course). PutnumLIVE.com supports the public discussion of issues. We also believe in social responsibility, as well as protecting familes and children. So, we leave the trash talk, about people, to the trash blogs."

Unless it's Halburn talking about Joe Haynes, Steve Andes or any other elected official, government worker or their families.
Then it's OK in his book.


Less than eight hours after all his whining, all of his bitching and moaning, Halburn starts another thread on Topix under the name No Eagloski. He posted the following story and comment:
halburn topix
Anytime you see a phrase about sending a politician packing, you know it's Hallburn.
Again, you can't play the victim when you start it, shithead.

You know what we think happened?
Tolles saw right the fuck through Hallburn's bullshit. He was having none of it.
He had his team pull IP addresses and it didn't take long at all to find out Mark was very, very guilty and it didn't take long for him to see right through it.

If the CEO of Topix was a woman, Hallburn would be planning another "travel feature" to Washington DC.

You got TOLD, fatboy.

Halburn, you're an America-hating communist pussy. The First Amendment contains no provision anywhere that reads, "This applies only in matters Mark fucking Hallburn sees fit."

PutnamLIES.com demands you immediately resign your blog, shut it down and be barred from the internet for life. You have zero credibility!

Now get the hell out of town.

Monday, February 13, 2012

The Chronicles Of Markia 3

lyin' king


This week's episode features part three of four parts of Mark Halburn's deposition. This week he talks about noise, high weeds and his arrest.
He continues to be questioned by Paul Konstanty on behalf of Cleveland Construction.
Our comments are noted in red. Please leave yours in our comments section.
Q. The videotape that we were provided in this case, one of the videos, as I recall, is family gathering I think at Thanksgiving and it's various recording throughout the day. There was I believe earlier that morning at maybe 2 or 3 in the morning a worker that was picking up some equipment. Do you recall that?

A. Yes, very vividly.

Q. And you went out there with, in your car and your video camera and asked the gentleman who he was and who he worked for. Do you recall that?

A. Yes. When I called in the complaint to Putnam 911, they invited me to meet Sergeant Moore. I think he was sergeant. He got promoted, I don't remember the time line exactly. Jason Moore of the Hurricane Police. And they said, you know, he would like to meet you out there, go ahead and go out there. And it was 4:23 in the morning. I remember that very well. Not a time to disrupt your neighbor to pick up construction equipment on Thanksgiving morning. Completely inappropriate.

Q. In your opinion, does the videotape accurately depict the noise that was going on at that time?

A. Some of it. I didn't roll tape through the entire incident.

Q. You I believe started in the house. You showed the clock either on your stove or microwave. Do you recall that?

A. Correct.

Q. And is it your testimony that you could hear noise from inside your house?

A. Yes. That's what woke me up at 4:23 in the morning was the -- the piece of equipment had a, for lack of a better term, a reverse alarm or beep that I guess is required by OSHA, that he was backing it up across the parking lot, and it woke me up at 4:23 in the morning, otherwise I would have been asleep .

Q. And did you ever discover who that person worked for?

A. No. The police department refused to disclose that to me. I did get a recording of his license plate number.

Q. And what have you done with that?

A. Kept it on the tape.

Q. Have you made any effort to discover that man's identity?

A. I asked the police department to provide it, and they said that he gave Jason Moore a business card, Mr. Moore refused to give it to me. And then later when I went to the chief they said that he threw it away. I don't believe that he did, but that's what I was told by Chief Mullins.

Q. Can you tell me why the Hurricane Police are not a part of this lawsuit?

A. Because my attorneys have advised me that not to file a suit against them.

Q. And I assume that's true with respect to the malicious prosecution lawsuit that's recently been dismissed?

A. Yes, although that will probably be appealed. I'd certainly like for it to be appealed.

(How's that coming, by the way?)

Q. As a result of that dismissal of that malicious prosecution case, did you refer to either Judge Chafin or myself as a communist?

A. I don't recall.

Q. Do you recall whether you suggested that I should lose my law license?

A. I recall suggesting that anybody that argued against the First Amendment of the Constitution should lose their license. And that was a First Amendment issue that got distorted in the in the case.

Q. Are you suggesting that I lied to the court?

A. I don't have to suggest it.

(Right. Like
he's willing to risk his law license just to fuck with you, superstar.)

Q. Oh, I did, is that what you're saying?

A. Yeah. It was a First Amendment issue, and you went in there and argued about other things: First Amendment gives the press freedom of the press, and I was doing an investigative story about somebody that did not have a license, and your client had me arrested; and indeed he did not have a license, and that was established and he was cited for that.

(But that doesn't give you the right to trespass or harass the people working there. Write about all you want. Nobody attempted to prevent you from publishing or saying anything.)

Q. As a result of the construction of the Wal-Mart, was your service, your water service ever disrupted?

A. Yes.

Q. Was it ever discolored?

A. It was not discolored. Many, on many occasions we had low water pressure, because a tanker that had Kanawha Stone's label on it that was, or name or sign on the side, however you want to describe it, was consistently filling up at the bottom of the hill, and as a result the water pressure was reduced on more than one occasion, on at least one occasion. I believe more than one occasion the water was actually cut off. The city eventually had to move the water tap to the other side of Hurricane Creek Road because of my complaints as well as those of Sally MacDonald about the reduced pressure. And at one point the city actually had a -- and this water tanker was spraying to keep the dust level down. At one point the city actually had a water shortage and was having to purchase water from someone else and even raised the water rates to pay for that while water was being, instead of being used for human consumption was being sprayed on the Wal-Mart property. Instead of being trucked in from somewhere else they were wasting the water in Hurricane and contributed to water shortage.

(If they hadn't sprayed, he'd have complained about the dust.)

Q. And did the driver of that water truck threaten you with a-

A. Yes.

Q. -- with a wrench?

A. Yes.

Q. And do you know that man's identity?

A. I do not.

Q. Did you ask for him to be arrested?

A. Yes.

Q. And what was the result?

A. They did not arrest him because they told me that I did not have video of it, I only had still pictures of it. He should have been arrested.

Q. As a result of the construction of the Wal-Mart, have you sustained any damage to walls in your house? We talked about the foundation before. Have you lost sheetrock, have screws started to come out of the sheetrock, separate from seams, anything like that?

A. No.

Q. I want to give you an opportunity to tell me, aside from the things that we've already talked about here today, the damages that you have sustained, you and your wife have sustained as a result of my client's activities.

A. Excessive noise, dust, dirt, smoke, destruction of peace and quiet in our home and in our yard. When my wife bought the home and I eventually moved into it, it was a very quiet neighborhood. Even though the interstate is probably a quarter of a mile away, we rarely heard the interstate. I mean, there was -- sometimes you would hear a horn on the interstate or something like that, but it was as if it wasn't there, even though we're probably 90 seconds to the interstate from our, you know, from the front of our lawn. It was, it was a place you would come at the end of the day or from work or wherever you were and you would come home and it was quiet and peaceful, and, you know, it was a pleasant place to be. You could hang out in the front yard, sit in the hammock if you want, or, you know, play with one of the nieces or nephews on the swing. And now it's, you know, it's like having Godzilla stomp on your neighborhood. The noise is terrible. Our Easter egg hunt on Easter of this year, a couple of times a car alarm went off. Little kids are like Uncle Mark or Daddy, or whoever they're talking, you know, what is that or why is that going off. You know, you can't enjoy the home that you're paying a mortgage on and that, you know, was purchased to have a nice, quiet place for a family. We have a 10-month-old baby now that we've been blessed with, we love him dearly, but to take him out in the front yard, there's no, there's no enjoyment anymore, there's no pleasure anymore in enjoying the front yard of our home. And even the side yard, which is over near the construction company, you know, the noise level is so bad that you get out of your car when you come home, open the door, and the first thing you hear is traffic noise from the Wal-Mart. Trucks delivering at 4 or 5 in the morning. You know, 5:00 this morning a truck woke up our son. You know, he went back to sleep, but eventually we -- but, I mean, you can't enjoy it anymore. And I don't know how many times 12:15 in the morning the street sweeper. There's no reason to sweep the parking lot of Wal-Mart, you know, at 12:15 in the morning. That could be done at 8:00 at night before people go to sleep. You mentioned the construction worker on Thanksgiving morning. The day before that the city street sweeper was out at a few minutes before 5 in the morning. And -bless you -- and disrupting us.

Q. Incidentally -

A. And Wal-Mart refuses to cooperate. You know, we've asked them run, I've asked them run the street sweeper at 8:00 at night, you know, when we're still awake.

Q. You agree that my client doesn't have any control over that?

A. No, but had your client not done what they did, the Wal-Mart wouldn't be there.

Q. And that's really the complaint that you have is the fact that there's a Wal-Mart across the street from your house now?

A. No. The complaint that I have is the excessive noise and the excessive traffic. I was up in Barboursville the other night and I've talked to the state of West Virginia about there used to be on that property before the Wal-Mart was built, there was traffic access on the other side of the property, and that access was taken away during the construction at the direction of the DOT, and they made the comment to me, I think it was Mr. Kramer, well, you know, why are you special, we put a lot of traffic in front of homes in Barboursville and they're not calling us and complaining. So I went up there the other night and actually looked at it in anticipation of this meeting, and all of the traffic there ends before it gets to those homes, and there's a berm on one side of the street next to the first home and there's a berm on the Wal-Mart side. We don't have that. There's nothing protecting us from that traffic noise.

Q. Is there something that can be done, in your opinion, to reduce the noise problem that you have?

A. Absolutely.

Q. What is it?

A. They could -- on the land strip between our home and the Wal-Mart they could put up, they could extend the wall higher and they could put up trees to do that. They can go ahead and the road that runs parallel to our road that goes up in front of our home, overnight they could shut that portion of the road down. There's many places where you can't make a right-hand turn during certain hours or you have to go a certain speed during school hours or whatever. As you go up the road, you've been to the property, I'm assuming, you can make, and they send the trucks to the left, you could, they could restrict access to that road overnight. During the day there is the Hurricane Marketplace at the end of the road, and I can understand why they want to have that road open during the day. But they could shut down that road to traffic at night and divert it to the other area of the Wal-Mart property so it's not close to our home. They could aim the lights better or shield the lights better so that it's not near our home. They could put trees on the front of our property, you know, on our, you know, on our lawn to, you know, to block some of the light and some of the noise. You know, I mean, I've even had women screaming at I'm assuming their husbands or boyfriends at 12:00 at night. You're sitting in your house and you hear a woman screaming at somebody from the Wal-Mart parking lot. Nobody wants to live like that, except them or her. I'm not sure he did.

(They could repeal the laws of physics!!!)

Q. Recently you've tried to have the PCDA buy your wife's house; right?

A. That's partly true. We've asked the PCDA to buy our property before the Wal-Mart was even put in.

Q. Okay.

A. So it's not just recently.

Q. Well, I don't want to be untruthful, but recently you posted on your web site that you attended a meeting of the PCDA and when you broached the subject they all just got up and left.

A. Correct.

Q. Is that accurate?

A. Yes. This is an agency that says they want to develop that hill and want jobs, but when they have the opportunity to talk about it they get up and leave.

Q. Do you know why they have that reaction to you?

A. Because they don't want to purchase our property. Because they say one thing to the public and when it comes to the opportunity for them to create jobs and develop the hill and the things that Gary Walton has said in the press, along with admitting to the Daily Mail that he lied to me about the option to buy when I asked him when we discovered it several years ago. They turn their back on us. We've invited them to meet at our home with our neighbors. At one point we had our neighbors come and nobody showed up. They have basically said, you know, Hey, you're on your own and you're not going to help us. Not only is it the issue of them not willing to purchase our neighborhood, and not just our property but the neighbor's, but the PCDA has a web site that has properties listed for sale that they're trying to promote the development of, and you would think an agency that is publicly saying we want to develop this hill and create jobs here would have all of the neighbors' properties posted. And we have asked them to do that, and they have never put it on their web site.

(Or is it because you've done nothing but harass them and call them names?)

Q. And other than being the construction company that built the Wal-Mart, Cleveland Construction doesn't have any control over the PCDA; correct?

A. To my knowledge, correct. I don't think any members of Cleveland Construction live in Putnam County and vote or have anything to ...

Q. Aside from what we've talked about already here today; do you have other complaints about Cleveland Construction that I should know about?

A. They could have worked with us about schedule, they could have put up a sound wall across the construction, around the construction site or at least around the part of the construction site that adjoins neighbor, you know, people's homes. I don't think there was a need for one on the Orchard Park side or the Courts Motor side. They, you know, they could have come to us and said, Look, we're going to build this thing, what can we do to make it easier for all of you. At several point, or one point I even provided them with D and I's work schedule and said, Hey, this is when we're gone, you know, do whatever you got to do, but when we're home please, you know, give us a break, and they refused to do that. That was also provided to Ben Newhouse at the City of Hurricane. Their attitude through the whole thing was, Hey, we're going to do what we're going to do, and if you don't like it, you know, tough.

Q. And do you think that your attitude was fair to them?

A. Yes.

Q. Making multiple phone calls on the same day, that's a fair attitude to take?

A. It is when the noise and the problem continues. If they had solved it the first time, there wouldn't have had to be multiple phone calls. There wouldn't have been multiple complaints. For some reason Cleveland Construction felt like, well, you know, we're going to earn a living and we don't care what it does to you, and, you know, you've got to put up with it. And I don't know of any other industry that acts like the construction industry.

Q. I asked you earlier if you suffered any physical injury as a result of this construction, but to be clear, have you sought any medical care of any kind as a result of this Wal-Mart being constructed?

A. My blood pressure has gone up and I have been prescribed blood pressure medication, and I believe that it's connected to that.

Q. In your opinion, your high blood pressure is related to the construction of the Wal-Mart?

A. Correct.

Q. And did your doctor tell you that?

A. He said I needed to cut down on the stress, and he recommended that I move away from there.

Q. Did he make any other recommendations for you?

A. He prescribed the blood pressure medication.

Q. Just solely because of the stress?

A. Correct.

Q. The arrest that you talked to Ms. Sanders about earlier, that was in '90 in California?

A. 1989.

Q. Was the plea in '90?

A. The plea was in '90.

Q. And that was -

A. Well, the plea agreement was in '90, the not guilty plea was 1989.

Q. And you pled to disturbing the peace on advice of counsel?

A. Correct.

Q. And after that then you also sued the company that made the complaint?

A. Correct.

Q. What did you sue them for?

A. For the false arrest.

Q. And then they went into bankruptcy?

A. And then they went into bankruptcy after the lawsuit was filed. I might add that Lee Baca, who is now the Los Angeles County sheriff, came out and took me out to lunch to apologize for even having me arrested. That, he said that that should never have happened.

(Sure he did)

Q. Did the City of Hurricane police officer or chief of police apologize to you in this case?

A. No.

Q. Do you think it's fair to hold Cleveland Construction responsible for other 4 subcontractors that were on that job?

A. If they're your subcontractors, yes.

Q. Okay. And so tell me, then, how does that square with the statement you made on your blog on May 19th of 2007? I won't read the whole thing, but it says, Shortly after 9 a.m. the first of several cement mixers from Arrow Concrete driving onto the Wal-Mart site wakes me up. Do you remember that?

A. I remember, I remember there were numerous times that Arrow Concrete trucks woke me up.

Q. And Arrow Concrete is not a defendant in this lawsuit; correct?

A. Not yet.

(Not ever from the looks of things)

Q. And then it says, I called the company and they blame Cleveland Construction; however, you can't ethically blame Cleveland Construction for the noisy trucks operated by Arrow Concrete. Do you remember making that statement?

A. I recall making that statement. Arrow Concrete should have quieter trucks.

Q. Okay. And do you, do you believe that it's ethical to blame Cleveland Construction for that?

A. If you're using a company that has noisy trucks, then you should be, you should be blamed for employing somebody that causes a problem. When you have -- you know, Cleveland Construction had numerous opportunities to cut down on the noise level. Having cement mixers arrive at 6 a.m., you know, is not an appropriate time. Not that there's ever an appropriate time to send a bunch of noise into somebody else's house.

Q. In your opinion, if all of the construction had been confined from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., would you still have all these complaints?

A. I would still have some of them. You know, I work evenings so I'm in my home during the day. I have the right to peace and quiet in my home. I don't think there's ever a good time to disrupt somebody's home and property.

Q. Have you been to the Hurricane Wal-Mart?

A. Yes.

Q. You were there for the opening, were you not?

A. I was not.

Q. You were not?

A. I was not. I hired Lawrence Smith to cover the opening.

Q. When-

A. Actually, I hired him to take pictures of the opening. I wrote the story.

(He wrote the story of an opening which he did not attend. Typical unethical Hallburn bullshit.)

Q. When was the last time you were there?

A. Several days ago.

Q. Why were you there?

A. To try to purchase some baby formula.

Q. Did you?

A. No, they did not have it in stock.

Q. Have you ever purchased anything from the Hurricane Wal-Mart?

A. Yes.

Q. How often do you shop there?

A. Maybe once a month. I try to avoid it, but sometimes with it being right there and having a need, you know, I do go in there. And I have a right to shop there like any other consumer. The first time I went was in the middle of the night when our baby was sick, and I had a choice of going to Kroger which was 20 minutes away or going to the Wal-Mart right there to get the medication, you know, get the medication for him and get it into his body quicker so he t could feel better quicker. I chose the Wal-Mart. My son was more important. I'm assuming you would make the same decision.

(Hypocrite)

THE DEPONENT: Is that rain?

MS. SOLOMON: Um-hmm.

THE DEPONENT: Great, my umbrella's in my car. Honey, now that you know where the car -- I'm just kidding.

(No he's not. It's just that there are other people in the room. If they weren't, she'd be out the door getting his umbrella. He'd probably make her hold it over his head on the way to the car too.)

MR. KONSTANTY: Mr. Halburn, those are all the questions I have for you at this time.

VIDEOGRAPHER: We're now going off the record at 4:15 p.m. (Whereupon, break.)

VIDEOGRAPHER: This begins tape number 4 in the deposition of Mark Halburn, and we're going back on the record at 4:25 p.m.

EXAMINATION

BY-MR.MULDOON:

Q. Good afternoon, Mr. Halburn. My name is Jim Muldoon. We met briefly before this all started a few hours ago. But I'm here on behalf of the City of Hurricane and Ben Newhouse, and I'll be asking you some questions. And just as everyone else, if you have any questions of me to clarify anything, just please do that. Okay?

A. Okay.

Q. I'm going to focus a little bit on the actual complaint. It's probably going to dovetail into some of the questions you've already been asked, and I apologize if they're a bit repetitive, but I want to try to focus on a few different things. In our complaint with regards to the City of Hurricane, you have an allegation that they didn't enforce their ordinance for noise.

A. Correct.

Q. In the complaint we talked, well, it lists as a restriction against excessive noise. We've talked a little bit about some of the noises that you've experienced, but can you explain in detail what excessive noise is?

A. Noise that you can hear inside your home with the windows shut that's generated hundreds of feet away. Noise that robs you of the ability to enjoy your front yard and that wakes you up all hours of the night or early morning or late at night. Noise that's, you know, that's disruptive that basically steamrolls people that, you know, live near, you know, a construction site or a business.

(You know)

Q. With construction sites, is there any level of acceptable noise?

A. I would imagine to the people that are working on the construction site everything is acceptable.

Q. What about-

A. I have no problem with the noise level on the construction site, but when it's coming onto our property and disrupting our home and making our lives miserable, their right to build a building is, you know, there's no doubt about that, their right to do construction, there's no doubt about that. Their right to do that stuff is on our property line.

Q. So in order to be acceptable, the construction noise would have to be as such not to come onto your property?

A. I would say so. They could put up a sound wall, they could get quieter equipment. We put a man on the moon in 1969 and they're saying that they can't produce a quieter tractor in the year 2008. I find that to be unbelievable. I don't think they want to spend the money to buy the better equipment.

(The laws of physics are rather rude.)

Q. And that's just supposition on you, you don't have any facts to support that do you?

A. Correct.

Q. In paragraph 10 of your, of count 2 of your complaint, you talk about, Although repeated requests have been made to the City of Hurricane. Can you describe those repeated requests for me?

A. We appeared before the city council in July of 2007, I had appeared before the city council the previous December, I made several phone calls to former Mayor Peak, current Mayor Edwards, city manager Ben Newhouse, and they all basically said, Look, you know, we want the Wal-Mart, the Wal-Mart's going to happen. I was told I was stupid by the now chief of police Mike Mullins that, you know, you're stupid to, you know, expect them not to disrupt you, and, you know, to complain about it, and, you know, why don't you just shut up. And, you know, they basically have acted like first class asses through the whole thing. And, you know, Mayor Edwards has told us, he says, you know, the bottom line is, he says, you know, if it's a choice between you guys and the Wal-Mart, we'd rather have the Wal-Mart because it generates a whole lot more money and eventually you'll get bought out.

Well, we were told that we'd get bought out before the deal closed, we were we were told we'd get bought out before the construction started, We were told we'd get bought out before the construction. The store has been open since March 7th, and we still haven't had a, you know, a buyout. We're still there. I think they tell us what they think we want to hear while they do what they want to do and screw us and they get their, you know, they get what they want.

Q. Did Chief Mullins actually use the word "stupid" or -

A. Yes.

Q. -- did he say naive?

A. He actually said both. On more than one occasion we had conversations about it. Chief Mullins also refused to arrest the guy that woke us up at 4:23 on Thanksgiving morning.

(If the shoe fits...)

Q. That would have been during the construction; correct?

A. That would have been during the construction, yeah.

Q. Now-

A. I don't understand why he had to show up at 4:23 to pick up equipment to take home to Pennsylvania on Thanksgiving morning. There's so many other times he could have done that.

Q. Before this construction started on the Wal-Mart project, did you make complaints of excessive noise regarding not Wal-Mart but some other entities?

A. The construction company next door. We've discussed that. And they were actually at one point cited until the police chief ripped it up or destroyed it or whatever he did to that citation. Former police chief.

Q. So when you actually made the complaint someone did something?

A. At one point.

Q. At one point. And that would have been to the Kanawha Construction that's adjacent to your property?

A. Adjacent to their property, yes.

Q. Did the police ever refuse to come out to your home?

A. Oh, many times.

Q. When was that?

A. Through the construction, since the construction.

Q. What about preconstruction ?

A. With the Kanawha, not Kanawha, the construction company next door. You know, as I said, I actually wrote a letter that was in the Hurricane Breeze prior to the 2003 election saying why doesn't the city -- the nuisance ordinance is written in the sense , that a police officer can cite someone. So why doesn't the city, why doesn't the police, I don't have the letter in front of me, but why don't they come out and do something. Pardon me. Then councilman Dave Boyles said, Well, you know, they were there first and this is like somebody moving next to, all kinds of bologna, you know. And the bottom line is I don't understand why the city would want property that looks terrible that takes down property values of everybody else around it. I don't know why the city would want to have a city where people can't hear themselves think in their front yard while the dozers are going off. Or, you know, it's supposed to be a civilized society, not the wild wild west with -- you know.

Q. Has there ever been an occasion where you made a complaint about the noise, the police come out, maybe it's not that noisy, have you ever run into that situation?

A. No. What they've told me is, Hey, it's construction noise, you have to live with it.

Q. Did any of the policemen ever say, Yeah, I agree with you that's excessive but it's construction noise?

A. Yes.

Q. Who would that be?

A. Runyon. What's the, what's the guy that they, that Edwards fired? Mullins and Wingo's brother-in-law. He was a chief for a while. I can't remember. Joe.

MS. SOLOMON: Just say you don't remember.

A. I don't remember.

Q. I don't remember is just fine.

A. You know, the chief before the current one.

Q. Okay. The former chief of police?

A. One of the former chiefs of police.

Q. That's for the City of Hurricane?

A. Correct.

MR. KONSTANTY: Joe Sisk?

THE DEPONENT: Thank you.

A. Actually, Joe is his, his middle name. His name is Sonny Sisk.

Q. In that same paragraph you said that the city willfully and intentionally refused to enforce the ordinance?

A. Correct.

Q. Why do you believe they willfully or intentionally failed to enforce it?

A. Because they failed to enforce it they did that willingly, they did it intentionally, they repeatedly refused to take action. The mayor in the, I think it was July 2nd, 2007, council meeting, that should be in the minutes, that, you know, we'll enforce the noise ordinance. And two days later she was crying calling me, you know, on my cell phone as I was coming out of the hospital for some testing, you know, it's a quarter to 7, it's a holiday, I can't even sleep. You know, she was going through, you know, a high-risk pregnancy and all of this is going on. And, you know, what kind of, you know, what kind of neanderthal would blast a home with a woman that's going through a high-risk pregnancy and continually make all that kind of noise, and what kind of neanderthal city would allow that to go on?

Q. And you said you made a lot of complaints about this?

A. Yes.

Q. When you made your complaints, well, how did you make your complaints? Let's just go that way.

A. Sometimes I went in person, sometimes I called, many times I sent e-mails to Ben Newhouse and Scott Edwards, and Joe Sisk and then Mike Mullins.

Q. So and the police chiefs?

A. Most of the time they were ignored with the exception of Patty Hager who's a current councilwoman who wrote back and said I don't care about your First Amendment rights to, you know, referring to my right to complain to my government officials, I think it's redress your government for grievances, wrote back and put in writing, I don't care about your First Amendment rights. Which I think stated volumes about her arrogance and her stupidity.

Q. When you went in person to complain, who did you complain to?

A. Ben Newhouse.

Q. Do you know when the first time you went is?

A. Joe Sisk. I don't recall.

Q. It would have been after the construction started sometime?

A. Correct. There was no reason to complain about the construction noise before it started.

(I'm sure he could have found something to complain about.)

Q. What about Joe Sisk, when did you, when did you first complain to him?

A . During the construction. After my arrest I remember discussing how is it that somebody can falsely accuse you of something. The police never even contacted me to say what was your side of the story, they just, you know, went out and got a warrant issued and had me arrested.

Q. You also said that you called some folks. Who did you call?

A. Don Chaney who's on the council, Lana Call who's on the council. I spoke in person to C. Brian Ellis, I don't know what the C stands for. Brian Ellis is on the council. And, again, we went to the meetings and, you know, complained.

Q. When you complained, did you complain more than once in a day?

A. Sometimes.

Q. More than-

A. And when we went to the meetings, I remember Lana Call and Patty Hager saying, Well, there's an exemption for businesses in the noise ordinance. There's no such exemption. You know, they would lie in a meeting and say, Well, you know, there's an exemption. And when I asked them to produce it, they just sat there.

(There's no exemption in the city code for the media to not pay B&O taxes either, but it doesn't keep him from not paying them.)

Q. So city council members were lying to you?

A. Right. Well, you're in the business district so the noise ordinance doesn't apply to that. No, there was no, no exemption for businesses, no exemption for construction, no exemption for anybody. But, you know, they wanted the Wal-Mart, so to hell with us.

Q. When you made these calls, did you use a cell phone or a land line?

A. Yes. Yes.

Q. Yes. Yes. What was your cell phone number at the time?

A. (304) 415-6397.

Q. And what was your land line at the time?

A. It's always been, well, since we moved to West Virginia or since she bought the house, as far as I know, (304) 562-0524.

(Call him anytime. Day or night.)

Q. Would you be surprised to learn that there could be, you know, 10 to 15 calls made in one day? Would that surprise you?

A. Yes.

Q. What do you think the maximum number of calls you made that day was?

A. I don't recall. However, the noise continued all day and as long as it continues and there's a law in the books that should be enforced, I don't have a problem with a person saying, Hey, you know, it's still not taken care of. Had the City of Hurricane properly enforced its noise ordinance, a lot of this would not have happened.

Q. By a lot, you mean the construction of the Wal-Mart?

A. A lot of the excessive noise. Again, I don't have a problem with construction. We have construction going on down the hill from us that is probably the same distance as part of the Wal-Mart store if not much of the Wal-Mart store, and I don't hear it. There was some rock drilling for the bank or rock breaking for the bank, and the KFC, you know, made some -- Arby's is going in. I've never had a problem with Arby's at all.

Q. So you just had to make a few complaints and then that resolved itself?

A. Well, no. They basically did what they wanted until they were done. But, you know, the bank noise, you know, since they broke the rock is, you know, rarely, I rarely heard anything, and when I have heard it it's been when I've been driving down the road with my window open or something. I don't hear it inside the house at all.

Q. So --

A. KFC was a constant problem.

Q. So you think it was more of a duration issue? If they're making, building a bigger KFC you probably would have made a few more complaints?

A. I don't know. I mean, that's speculation.

(Bullshit. You would have complained your fat ass off. Especially if KFC would have come across with a few buckets of extra crispy)

Q. Did you ever get a chance to speak with the mayor about this noise level?

A. Both of them.

Q. What, what were the circumstances of those contacts?

A. Well, I spoke to Mr. Peak on the phone and in person, and his response is, Well, it's noisy, Mark, there's nothing we can do about it. Mayor Edwards originally said, Well, I'll enforce the noise ordinance, and then he, he would say nice things in the meeting to look good in front of everybody and then not do anything about it. And then he later told me after the July 4th situation when I called him on the telephone, he says, Unless the circuit judge makes me do it, I'm not going to do it, I don't care what the law says. You'll have to get a court ruling to make me enforce that law.

Q. What about the in-person contacts with the mayors, where did they take place?

A. With Mayor Peak at city hall, and I think once I saw him at the post office. And Scott Edwards city hall. And then there was a time when our roadway was blocked and D couldn't get to our home. When Scott Edwards came and trespassed on our property after I told him not to walk on our property, he did it anyway, and I had contact with him there. And that's on the video.

Q. And what did you tell him?

A. Well, we were complaining at that point mostly about the lack of access to, you know, to our home. They, you know, blocked the roadway after they sent us a letter saying, you know, they meaning the construction people and Putnam Sewer District and Mike McNulty sent us a letter saying that, you know, there shouldn't be a problem and it's going to happen on the other side of the road from your house. And, you know, like I said earlier they will say what they want to, you know, try to appease people and then they just do whatever they want. And once they're in the middle of it it's like, Well, you know, what do you want us to do about it, what can we do. It's like, Leave us alone. I think those three words probably sum up this whole problem, Leave us alone. Had they left us alone, we wouldn't have had, you know, we wouldn't be here today.

Q. I don't, I don't want to take your words out of context, but I think you may have said that you spoke with a Mr. Clay -is he one of your neighbors -- about the noise level?

A. He is one of my neighbors, yeah.

Q. Did you get to talk to him about the noise levels?

A. I had talked to him about the noise levels.

Q. What did you talk to him about?

A. About how bad they were. And he says, Yeah, they're bad, but he says, you know, they won't do anything about it, it doesn't do anything, do any good to complain, the city does what they want and they're going to do what they want. Although he did go to city council and complained about noise and traffic and...

Q. What happened at the city council meeting?

A. Oh, they sat there, they listened and they did whatever they damn well pleased. They don't -- Hurricane doesn't enforce any law that Hurricane doesn't want to enforce, whether it's the nuisance law on the property next door. I get e-mails and phone calls from people. I'll give you an example. They cited our property a few, while I was in South Carolina when D was pregnant. We had some weeds on a hill in back of our home as lots of people do, and they gave her I believe it was 48 hours to clean up those weeds. And she had to buy a bigger weed eater and hire her nephews to help clean it up. I was out of state. Scott Edwards' building, the mayor's building had weeds on his property, because I was in town about a week later, took pictures of them. There's still holes in the siding, there's a bullet hole in the window that months later is still there. They won't enforce the nuisance law against his unsightly property, which it clearly says if anybody can see it and it's, you know, unsightly or whatever from, you know, from a public place, that it's a nuisance. They won't -- and it's still like that. I've got pictures taken six months later, and I think if I were to walk you out there today the bullet hole is still in the window, the siding is still missing. He did cut the weeds. But, you know, hey, it's, you know, the Wal-Mart neighbors, they'll screw us but, you know, the city council Brian Ellis's street where his home and business is, people complained about the traffic on the street, they put in speed bumps like that. We complain about the noise, they don't do squat. It's a double standard.

Q. You said that --

A. And you can come out and see those speed bumps, too.

Q. You said that your wife was cited for failing to maintain the property, cutting the weeds and that?

A. The weeds on the hill. We have a hill in back of our home that is probably 150 feet, 200 feet from the roadway. It's not a situation where it's not a, you know, it's a semi rural area. Wal-Mart's hill, by the way, I have pictures of all the weeds on their hill and most of them are still there, but we got, you know -- they come out and cite a pregnant lady knowing that her husband's out of state, giving her 48 hours to fix it or a $500 fine. But the mayor's property, it can look like shit.

(Semi rural but zoned commercial, remember? That's what allegedly makes D's property so valuable.)

Q. Did you get the -- so you had your nephew come out and fix that problem?

A. Her nephews. And the mayor's property still looks terrible. And here's the punch line. After I went out and took pictures of it, put that on my web site, he had Mike Mullins who was then the captain call me up and say, Hey, he doesn't want you on his property. I told Mullins, Has he ever heard of zoom lenses? Councilman Hager had weeds on her property. Councilman Ellis had weeds in back of his property. But, you know, they've got to go after a pregnant lady. Does that make your clients feel more like tough men to harass a pregnant lady like that?

MS. SOLOMON: Don't ask him any questions.

THE DEPONENT: He's laughing, for the record.

(At you, you stupid fuck.)

Q. I believe you may have testified earlier that you believe that the City of Hurricane is corrupt?

A. Um-hmm.

Q. How so?

A. They allow the mayor and their council people to do what they want. They go after people that are critical of them. They harass citizens of -- I get complaints about people that say that, you know, a Realtor contacted me and said that her client was told the grass was too tall, and they had to go out and cut it. I went out there and Mayor Edwards' home grass was taller than the grass at the house that was for sale. They don't enforce the laws that they want. Their FOIA law is -- they require $35 an hour for FOIA research, which the FOIA law in West Virginia doesn't allow for charging for research, but nobody's going to pay $35 an hour for -- and, of course, the reason for them doing that I believe is that they don't want anybody to see the paperwork. They don't want anybody to know. The election for the mayor, which is supervised by their own recorder, which is a complete conflict of interest because she was also running for office, that case is in the Supreme Court's hands, it's going to be heard in November. And a lot of people feel that was rigged. The unsealed ballots are what got the mayor in. On the last ballot box, he was losing all night long until the unsealed ballots were counted. And you can laugh, but a lot of people don't think that's funny.

(No, the reason they charge $35 an hour is because your fishing expeditions tie up employees for hours while they do your research for you.)

Q. I don't think I'm laughing. Is it a fair statement that you believe that there's random law enforcement in the City of Hurricane?

A. I would say that there's random law enforcement, I would say there is malicious law enforcement.

Q. Is any of this based on first-hand knowledge?

A. Yeah. I mean, me. They prosecuted me on a he said situation where I was investigating a blaster that wasn't licensed. We had recently, at the KFC construction, they knocked out the power at the KFC construction. I went down and took pictures of it, and the guy that knocked out the power grabbed me because I was taking his picture. There was another witness who's one of the neighbors up the hill. Lieutenant, Lieutenant Lusher, who is the same man that took the warrant to get me arrested, happened to drive by. I stopped him, told him about it, the witness says, I saw it happen, and he just drove away. Now -- but he prosecuted me. You know, I had an eyewitness that said this guy attacked him, but Lusher drove away, didn't do anything.

Q. Are you aware of any other let's say random law enforcement with not you as being one of the complainants for the victims?

A. Well, yeah. You have a city councilwoman who had the weeds in her front yard. She also, by the way, I believe it was the 29th of May through the 5th of April, had a mountain size or a small hillside size stack of boxes out on the street or next to the street outside of her business/home, Patty Hager. I contacted city hall. Sam Cole who ran against Scott Edwards told me that he contacted city hall about the mess, and nothing was done about it for, you know, pretty close to a week when they -- I don't know if they were picked up or stolen or what happened, but they were finally gone.

You know, we've talked about the situations with Edwards' business. We've got the construction yard next door that's looked terrible. I mean, there's weeds behind that today. There's weeds in that construction yard today that, you know, right next to our property. We get cited, the property right next door has weeds, they didn't get cited and they're still there. You know, it's like Dukes of Hazard, and what was his name, Rosco Coal train or whatever. I mean it's ...

MR. KONSTANTY: It's Rosco P Coltrane, for the record.

A. Yeah, somebody once, somebody just said, Welcome to West Virginia. I don't think it's like that in most towns.

(Dukes of Hazzard reference FTW! And yeah, it's like that in every small town in West Virginia.)

Next week, we'll hear more about excessive noise, and the people that were mean to Mark.
 

Related Articles:
The Lyin' King 
The Chronicles Of Markia
The Chronicles Of Markia 2