Friday, March 5, 2010

HURRICANE SWITCHED ZONING, BUT NOT FOR FOR WALMART'S NEIGHBORS

Homeowners Were Not Informed Or Asked Because Their Properties Were Not Effected

Halburn Proven Wrong Once Again



For years, Halburn has been complaining that the city changed the zoning on his second wife's house in some underhanded way.
There's just one problem with that statement: It simply isn't true.
At least in this case.

We won't bore you with who bought what from whom and who lives in what trailer because it doesn't make any difference. What we will tell you is that his second wife's land is listed as Map 18, Parcel 20 in the tax map books.
What we will also tell you is that the letter he shows has nothing to do with any of her property.


Halburn wants to let the document posted above speak for itself.
So do we. And it does. He's wrong.
Let us quote the relevant paragraph:
"Area 1:
All property within the city limits as of this date bounded by Peach Ridge Road to the north, I-64 to the south, route 19 to the west and the road to the Hurricane Treatment Plant to the east including the treatment plant property. This property is also described on Tax Map 18, Parcels 30 through 36, Tax Map 19, Parcels 1 through 7 and Tax Map 20, Parcels 1, 2 and the part of Parcel 3 on the north side of I-64."
Does anyone see the words "Map 18, Parcel 20" in there?
Let's look at the tax map.
Click to enlarge.
The red area is the parcels referred to in the letter as "Area 1"
See that blue area?
That's the property owned by Halburn's second wife. Notice that it's not in the annexed area.
Let's see that info overlaid onto a aerial shot.
Notice how Area 1 doesn't come close to the wife's property.
We'll repeat this again for the dullard on Grace Drive.
IT'S BECAUSE THIS ANNEXATION DIDN'T INCLUDE YOUR SECOND WIFE'S PROPERTY!
Now, we don't know when or if the zoning was changed on her property. What we DO know is that is wasn't changed by this letter. It is not the same piece of property.
This is yet another case of Halburn being so blinded by his hatred of the Hurricane city government and his pathological need to always be right that he runs a factually wrong 16 year old story masquerading as news.
He is so anxious to crow that he "nailed" the Mayor that he didn't even bother to read the description of the land that had its zoning changed.
The only one who got nailed here is you, lardass.
Once again:


UPDATE: As of Sunday, March 7, the zoning article has been taken off Fatso's page.
Another victory for PutnamLIES.com!
Once again, we've exposed Halburn's lies and forced him to remove a false, misleading article.
We'll never see a correction, but his removal of the story is an admission that he was wrong. That's probably as good as we could hope for.

GO GREEN: PutnumLIVE.com is online only. He does not publish a paper edition because too many people would wipe their asses with it! Please do not wipe your ass with your monitor when you visit PutnumLIVE.com because it might cause serious injury!

10 comments:

  1. Perhaps the city should sue HIM for libel!!! Or, at the very least demand his resignation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. His resignation from what??

    Nope, that site needs to go.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How about his resignation from life?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Somehow Fatass is going to make this all "Silly Scotty's" fault for not complying with his FOIA request.

    ReplyDelete
  5. He's back at his old tricks claiming he was swindled...in my humble opinion he's REALLY crowding close to having an enforceable libel complaint lodged against him.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anyone want to join "The Lords of Walmart" The initiation is a drive-by honking.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The story was NOT removed. It's simply hidden on his site. I found it completely by accident today.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Apparently, the only way to get him to stop calling and harassing, is to keep hanging up on him. It worked for me.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The other way to get him to stop contacting you or calling you is keep proving him wrong to the point of embarrassment. He's not said boo to me since I started the response Blog.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Now he's claiming that the City of Hurricane violated the FOIA, tried to mislead him and did not provide the information he requested ... then threatens he'll take legal action against the City.

    ReplyDelete